Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Ghostbusters/Ghostbusters 2



I was 9 years old when Ghostbusters came out, so I might've been too young for this film, but thankfully, my parents let me watch anyway.

I wasn't alone. My brother was 6; my sister was 4. I can't remember whether we all piled up and went to a movie theater (unlikely) or the drive-in theater a mile from our house (more likely), or whether we rented this one on glorious VHS (most likely, and most glorious). Point being, my parents didn't care.

I bring this up because I was looking at reviews of Ghostbusters on Netflix and couldn't get over how many uptight parents see this film as inappropriate for children based on the sexual content and language.

So, the demonic hell-dogs are cool for a 9-year-old? How about the ghost of the old woman in the library — the one that transforms into a vicious she-beast? General freaky things? Glowing red eyes? Decomposing bodies driving taxicabs? Parents are dumb.

At one point in the '80s, a neighbor had the Ghostbusters computer game, which had a simple premise: capture ghosts, make money, and buy more crap. I usually got stuck with the VW Beetle and not enough money to do anything except drive around, but sometimes, I did well enough to buy the bambalance. Of course, no video game is a substitute for buying the real thing. I miss that game.

I'm told I look like the main character in the modern Ghostbusters video game. I'm also told that game is reminiscent of the classic PC game, but after playing the demo and getting frustrated, I'm not so sure. I just wanted a bambalance.

So here's a question I've often pondered. When the Ghostbusters are told to choose the form of the destructor, and Venkman says, "So if you think of J. Edgar Hoover, J. Edgar Hoover will appear and destroy us," how come J. Edgar Hoover doesn't show up? Does Ray think of the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man before Venkman thinks of Hoover? These are important questions, people.

These two films are best viewed as a double feature. At least that way, you don't have to try to make a special event of sitting through the vastly inferior sequel, which I still enjoy for some reason. Maybe that's because I enjoy seeing a bit more of these characters and how they ended up a few years later.

Another upside: I can't look at Viggo Mortensen in any film without shouting, "He is Viggo!" Sometimes, I follow this with the optional: "You are like the buzzing of flies to him!" I don't care if I'm watching Lord of the Rings or The Prophecy or A History of Violence. I never said I was easy to hang out with.


(Artwork by Kory, one of my students.)


Strangely, I don't come back to Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters 2 often. Even though I enjoy both films, I sort of forget they're there. The films are classic, though, and I'm glad to have an excuse to revisit both in the same night.

Maybe someday I'll get to watch all three.

2 comments:

  1. "Everything you are doing is bad. I vant you to know."

    ReplyDelete
  2. These movies are a treasure of my child hood. I am told my mother was pregnant with me when her and my father went to see this so I guess you could say I saw this before I was born. Back in 88 I saw it on VHS(on a 13 inch tv) and spent the entire scene of the terrordogs breaking out of the statues, behind my mother scared witless. The only thing that got me to watch it agian was the awesomeness that was The Real Ghostbusters cartoon. Then in late 1989 my Grandma's home town theater(A little one screen place from back in the 50s) was showing Ghostbusters 2. I think that is why I prefer the sequel because as far as I can remember it was my first theater experience. Also let me know if you ever need some one to play through the game so you can enjoy the banter between the original cast while a guy who looks like you is doing all the work :P
    Tristan
    PS
    I have a PKE meter let me know if you want me to bring it to work someday :D

    ReplyDelete

Please enter your comment here. Be civil.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.